New Post

Challenging an Arbitral Award and the Binding Nature of Arbitration Agreements

Arbitration has become a widely accepted method for resolving commercial disputes, offering flexibility, confidentiality, and efficiency compared to traditional litigation. Yet, parties sometimes find themselves questioning the outcome of arbitration or the very basis of the arbitration itself. Two common scenarios arise: when a party refuses to comply with an arbitration agreement , and when a party seeks to challenge an arbitral award after it is rendered.

This article explores both scenarios in light of general arbitration law principles and dispute resolution practices.

The Binding Nature of Arbitration Agreements

An arbitration clause is a contractual commitment by the parties to refer disputes to arbitration rather than to court. Once agreed upon, and as long as it is valid and clearly expressed in writing, the arbitration clause is binding. A party cannot later reject arbitration simply because it no longer finds it convenient.

Even where a party alleges the absence of a clear arbitration clause, courts generally examine the broader context. If the parties have referred to the clause in correspondence, or have acted in a way that acknowledges its existence, that may be sufficient to confirm its enforceability. Silence in the face of an arbitration demand , or failure to raise objections early, can also weaken a claim that no valid agreement exists.

This underscores the importance of arbitration clause enforcement and clarity in drafting.

When One Party Refuses to Arbitrate

If a party refuses to participate in arbitration despite an existing agreement, the other party has several options. Arbitration rules and national laws often provide a mechanism to appoint arbitrators unilaterally if one side fails to cooperate. Once the arbitral tribunal is formed, the arbitration proceedings may continue even in the absence of the non-participating party—provided that due notice was given and the opportunity to respond was offered.

A party's refusal to arbitrate does not invalidate the dispute resolution process but may result in a binding award being issued without their participation.

Challenging an Arbitral Award

Arbitral awards are generally final and binding.  However, legal systems allow a party to seek annulment or set aside an arbitral award under limited circumstances, typically including:

- Absence of a valid arbitration agreement.
- Failure to notify a party properly or allow adequate procedural fairness. 
- The tribunal exceeding its jurisdiction or authority.
- Procedural irregularities affecting the integrity of the process.
- Violations of public policy .

It’s important to note that courts do not revisit the merits of the case. A challenge to an arbitral award is not an appeal, but rather a request to nullify the award due to specific legal defects.

Procedural Fairness and Document Submissions

A common issue in arbitration is whether one party was denied the chance to fully present its case. For example, a tribunal may refuse to accept documents submitted outside the deadlines agreed upon. However, when the parties adopt a procedural order at the outset—setting timelines for submissions and hearings—both sides are bound by it.

Tribunals have the authority to enforce those timelines to ensure efficiency. As long as the process offers a fair opportunity and the deadlines were clear, the refusal to accept late documents does not constitute a denial of due process. 

Conclusion

Arbitration agreements are not merely symbolic—they are legally enforceable commitments to resolve disputes through a specific and agreed-upon process. Refusing to participate in that process rarely succeeds as a strategy and may even result in default awards.

Likewise, efforts to set aside arbitration awards face a high threshold. Only serious breaches of procedural fairness, jurisdictional overreach, or conflicts with public policy can justify such actions. Understanding the scope and limits of these challenges is essential for anyone involved in arbitration or international dispute resolution. 

By respecting deadlines, honoring the procedural framework, and ensuring clear contractual arbitration clauses , parties can navigate arbitration confidently and minimize the risk of disputes over the process itself.